Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Complete cookbook of home-style dishes - Is it more practical to give "pork" as a scholarship to students than to reward cash?
Is it more practical to give "pork" as a scholarship to students than to reward cash?
The school's reward for outstanding students, whether in cash or in kind, or spiritual rewards such as certificates, is a kind of positive energy guidance and encouragement, which promotes students to love learning and study hard. For the school to use pork instead of cash scholarships, many people here praised it as an "innovative" move for scholarships. Objectively speaking, it is really "grounded" for this school to distribute pork to students. But there is no need to exaggerate its innovative significance. After all, the school just changed the way of awarding gold in kind, and both have their own advantages and disadvantages. The search for gold can be led by students according to their own situation, while the sending of gold in kind, although students feel heavy when receiving it, can be shared with their parents, is actually decided by the school rather than the students.

When the bonus amount is not high, it is not a big problem to issue in-kind bonuses, but if the bonus amount is relatively large, if the school decides to issue in-kind bonuses instead, it will cause great controversy. In my opinion, it is better to give scholarships to students, and it is better for students and parents to control themselves.

If there is a reward for having two children and three children, I will choose to have one.

Whether to have children is not based on economic conditions, but on whether the husband and wife reach a consensus and give the children a stable future and growth environment. Men and women who struggle to have children because of the difficult living conditions are actually very responsible parents and should be affirmed and praised. How can I put it? Compared with those who have children at will regardless of the future, the former is a hundred times stronger. Children are not cats and dogs, so they can't come and go at will. Many children were abandoned and given away, and many children experienced the pain of family breakdown when they were minors, which was caused by parents' irresponsibility. work

As a qualified adult, after giving birth to a child, we should support and educate him, and we should not let the child get hurt at an early age or give up, which will increase the burden on society.

Children's experience of happiness lies not in being poor and rich, but in whether they can get the care of their parents. Young people have just formed a family, and their economic conditions may be average. They feel that they can't give their children a comfortable living environment and hesitate to have children.

In fact, if the relationship between husband and wife is stable and their life goals are clear, it is natural to have children, and economic difficulties are only temporary. As long as they work hard, everything will change. But when the economy improves, the risk of having another child is that the economic conditions are good, but the physical conditions are declining. Missing the best childbearing age is equally cruel to children!

In fact, having children has a great relationship with people's age, and economic conditions are not too important. Getting married and having children is a process that each of us has to go through. But after marriage, if you can't provide good conditions for your children, you can't have more children. ..... We say this because we have an obligation to create good living conditions for our children, and we have a responsibility to train our children to succeed, and we must consider the actual situation of family life.

1, we have an obligation to create good conditions for our children. If not, you can't have more children.

When we get married and have children, we have the obligation to create good living conditions for our children and let them have good development space. ..... This obligation is not only based on the relevant regulations, but also comes from our sense of responsibility ... Because of this, we must undertake corresponding obligations to our children and create the best conditions for them. ..... if we can't afford more, we can't have more children.

As parents, we have the responsibility to train our children into adults. Otherwise you can't have more children.

As parents, we should not only fulfill our obligations to our children, but also take on the responsibility of cultivating and educating them to become talents. ..... This responsibility is very important, and the children's future and future depend on it. ..... Because of this, we must take this responsibility for our children. ..... having more children means that families with limited conditions can't raise their children better. Such a family should rationally give up the idea of having more children and face this problem with a realistic attitude.

3. On the question of whether to have more children, we must consider the actual situation of the family.

Whether to have more children is closely related to the actual situation of your family. ..... Specifically, if one's family conditions are relatively good, one not only has enough economic conditions to create good conditions for children, but also has enough energy to train and educate children. Then there is no problem in choosing to have more children. ..... but if one's own conditions are limited and choosing to have more children is not conducive to the growth of children, then one should give up this idea rationally, so as to get the most ideal result, make family life harmonious and let one's children get the best development.