A woman selling 150 bowls of cooked meat in Chongqing was reported to have no products. From a legal point of view, the woman's pork buckle should be labeled, otherwise it does not meet the conditions of safe production, and will naturally be punished for violating the Consumer Protection Law and the Food Safety Law. However, from the legal point of view, this violation of the Food Safety Law and the Consumer Protection Law is indeed a bit hasty, and the legal person seems to have lost its due temperature at this moment.

From the perspective of legal maintenance, this kind of behavior is legal.

From the perspective of protecting consumers' rights and interests by law, this judgment seems reasonable. Aunt may sell hundreds of bowls of pork a day, and these pork can make a lot of money a day. The compensation of 50 thousand yuan is also the money that aunt can pay at any time. Aunt's meat was detained because she didn't put a production label on it, which was considered as an unqualified product, which essentially deviated from the legislative spirit of the Food Safety Law and the Consumer Protection Law. In the judge's judgment, it will be considered that there is no violation of relevant regulations. In the end, the aunt will compensate the consumer 10 times of the detained meat. It seems reasonable to compensate 50,000 yuan, but who will directly buy 150 bowls of detained meat for a normal consumer? Unless it is a big banquet, consumers in this case obviously have no special needs. Judging from the identification of ordinary consumers, the plaintiff may not have the qualification of a consumer at all, which seems a bit inappropriate.

From the perspective of legal balance, this punishment is unreasonable.

We can always see many delicatessens in the street. These delicatessens don't indicate when cooked food was produced at all, and the purchase date can only be seen in the purchase ledger. Judging from the fact that the aunt was fined 50,000 yuan for selling 150 bowls of meat, it is premature to conclude that the aunt violated the Food Safety Law in production and sales. We all know that there is no problem in applying the law, but we must give a reasonable explanation for this illegal act. Braised pork is a traditional food. Many merchants can sell out in one day if they cook delicious food, and the sales volume in one day is as high as hundreds of bowls. Aunt is making a meat-reducing product with excellent reputation. It's not illegal for aunt not to label. It's just a production habit of traditional deli. Law is to regulate behavior and punish illegal behavior. The aunt's behavior is not only harmless to society, but also a manifestation of inheritance. The judge should not be so reckless as to think that the unlabeled 150 bowl of braised pork sold by the aunt is an illegal product. Therefore, from the gentle point of view of the law, this hasty determination has lost the temperature that a legal person should have.