Artificial intelligence always leads the future era. For artistic sports such as gymnastics, diving and figure skating, the referee must work 8 hours a day. In this case, their psychological ability needs to be very strong and consistent, but the fact is that many judges simply can't keep the consistency of judgment standards. If anyone can do it, it must be a computer.

As their referee tool, the emergence of artificial intelligence can not only replace referees, but also reduce the workload of referees and assist athletes and coaches in their daily training. If artificial intelligence is used as a referee, the probability of fairness still accounts for a lot.

But many athletes have questioned this, such as basketball. With intelligent referees, although the penalty after each game is controversial, intelligence may predict who is diving and so on. I saw a passage in the news before, and now those gymnasts are constantly advancing their skills, looking for new angles, rotations and scoring points-so what if someone makes a group of unusual moves that have never been seen or recorded by a computer?

Then how to rule? In other words, intelligent referee and manual referee cannot be confused, each has its own advantages and each has its own irreplaceability, but when combined, they are complementary. ? ,