I won’t be able to answer the question if it doesn’t exceed 50 points. You are so cruel.

Your argument is very unarguable. Simply put, it’s a question of which came first, the chicken or the egg. And without the prefix, what is the object of the debate? Are we discussing the Industrial Revolution or the founding of New China? Are we discussing research and inventions or changing dynasties? The person who asked the question is stupid when it comes to debating. Moreover, the topic is biased. If it is innovation, it will be biased toward the premise that technology is the premise of technology. If it is reform, it will be biased toward technology being the premise of thought. Without the prefix, the debate will have no confrontation and no fulcrum. Once again, I express my deep contempt for the author of the question.

But debate can be argued after all. I won’t break the problem, and I’ll just give you the chicken and egg problem, and you can just watch and play with it.

Innovative ideas are more important than innovative technologies

Question 1: Is the eight-year war of resistance due to our indomitable patriotism or the innovation of millet plus rifle?

Question 2: Without Montesquieu's "The Spirit of the Laws", where would the innovation of the separation of powers in the contemporary English and French legal systems be?

Question 3: Which comes first, the blueprints or the construction work?

Question 4: May I ask the other debater, what are the steps to put an elephant in the refrigerator? (Two answers) If you can innovate your thinking, you will think of "open the refrigerator first, and then put the elephant in" only two steps. (If he answers this, you say) If the other debater objectively innovates your thinking, you will know that the elephant is much bigger than the refrigerator.

Question 5: Is it because people have advanced technology to build the Sophia Tower, or is it because people have innovated their aesthetic ideas?

Question 6: If Vienna had not lost its arms, it would probably not be beautiful and cherished, right? But who broke her arm with his extraordinary skills? (Unexpectedly, I think it’s beautiful because people’s aesthetic values ??have changed)

Question 7: Please explain the Handan toddler.

Innovating technology is more important than innovating ideas

Question 1: May I ask the other debater,

Question 2: Did Cai Lun innovate paper technology because he had chemistry? Theoretical guidance?

Question 3: Did Yuan Longping innovate hybrid rice based on rice technology or did he first invent the rice innovation theory?

Question 4: Ask the other debater to explain "The Origin of Species"; (after answering) ask the other debater to tell us whether it is their survival ability or the innovation of survival technology that leads to changes and mutations. , or is it because they are thinking "I want to transform, I want to transform" in their minds that they make the fish walk out of the water and make the monkey become a human?

Question 5: A cookbook can help you make good-looking dishes. Can you make delicious dishes without practicing cooking skills repeatedly?

Question 6: If there were no airplanes, would we have to ride the waves like Napoleon to travel around the world?

Question 7: Ask the opponent’s debate partner to explain the “castle in the air”.