You can't see the progress of the review, because the review of Tik Tok, volcano, headlines and other short videos all passed the mechanical review. It won't take long for an article or a video to pass the review. If the video you send is reviewed for too long, there is generally a certain degree of problem. What specific questions will be displayed in the background? Only you know the reason why you failed.

From the video itself, one is the video format or aspect ratio, and the other is the video clarity quality; From the perspective of audit, the first is the stacking of title keywords, the second is illegal keywords, the third is video content, and the fourth is the existence of the same video. So I insist on shooting my own original video, adding dubbing and subtitles, and reviewing and recommending a good theme, which is very fast. Even if you create a video for the second time, you should ensure the content and quality of the video. If you choose a topic that the robot can judge, it will be easier to pass the trial.

Nowadays, the examination time for sending videos and sending pictures and texts is getting longer and longer, and the conditions are getting stricter and stricter, and sometimes it can't even be said to be strict. Not only is the audit original, but the more original the content, the more it will enter manual audit. The manpower of manual audit in the background may be insufficient or inexperienced, which is not much better than machine audit.

Because these short video softwares are afraid of taking responsibility, they lack social experience in commenting on Bian Xiao, and the original content involves too much knowledge, so they are completely unsure. In particular, a lot of content related to current politics will be classified as sensitive content and not suitable for release, but I think there are a lot of messy entertainment content, which will soon pass.