Because this topic is very sensitive, I spent a lot of pen and ink in my last article to analyze the official and mainstream media's tone of this incident in detail. The following conclusions are drawn:

1. The editorial of People's Daily on December 6th showed that Mr. Liu himself was affirmed, and the basic evaluation was that he was the representative of entrepreneurs in China, a pioneer of reform, brave in struggle, and daring to venture and do things. The orientation of the reform of state-owned enterprises: stimulating the vitality of the market and giving birth to a batch of entrepreneurs.

At this moment when the debate of public opinion is so sharp, there is no doubt that the editorial issued by People's Daily at this time should represent the official final conclusion.

Second, Lenovo's internal notice shows that the Chinese Academy of Sciences answered Lenovo's question "Is there any loss of state-owned assets?" After the central inspection, the audit of the National Audit Office was no problem.

This reply was issued after about two months of online public opinion wars. It can't be the internal opinion of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. It must be consulted by state authorities at all levels before it is officially issued. It is an official conclusion.

1. Why didn't Lenovo directly clarify these questions to the public earlier?

Because these questions should not be answered by Lenovo, Lenovo's answers are meaningless and can only be answered by Chinese Academy of Sciences, State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission and National Audit Office.

Second, why didn't the Chinese Academy of Sciences, or even the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission or the National Audit Office come forward to respond to these public questions?

Because no one (including Mr. Sima) has questioned the above-mentioned units through formal channels, there will certainly be no reply.

The above two questions are actually very simple, and people with a little common sense should be very clear. Therefore, I have a question: for such a long time, many experts and enthusiastic people, including Mr. Sima's team, kept asking Lenovo, instead of directly asking the above-mentioned competent units and departments through formal channels. What is the reason?

well, judging from the above analysis, I have come to the conclusion that the curtain has fallen. Of course, this conclusion is within a limited scope, that is, from the legal compliance level, Lenovo has no problem. This problem is the core issue of this vigorous crusade against Lenovo initiated by Mr. Sima, because other doubts about Lenovo have long existed.

then, will the government have some preliminary opinions on other social and moral issues, such as excessive executive compensation and insufficient research and development of core technologies? No, ruling the country according to law is the core, others are positive policy guidance, such as giving more support to those enterprises that undertake more social responsibilities, but it is not easy to directly interfere with the legitimate operation of enterprises, which will usually be counterproductive.

Well, let's confirm the conclusion again. The scene that has been set by the government is the curtain of legal compliance (this scene is the most critical), and the scene of social morality should continue to be staged in the people for a long time. Then, in this scene that continues after this, what kind of performance should the protagonists of this drama have? Let me briefly talk about my views.

Let's talk about Professor Chea Chang, a popular protagonist of the "Liu Liu" school. I mentioned earlier that Professor Chea Chang may be a rare winner in this drama. The family background of three generations of academicians is well versed in all kinds of inside information of Chinese Academy of Sciences system. At first, the historical facts were relatively objective, and the storytelling style was long. After Mr. Sima's progress was frustrated, Professor Chea Chang relayed the banner of "Liu Liu", which really attracted a large number of fans. If he can maintain the objectivity and rigor of his discussion, plus his deep knowledge reserve and good analytical understanding ability, Professor Zhang should be able to take advantage of this Lenovo storm to promote his Chea Chang finance and economics to a new height. However, Professor Zhang is really puzzling, since he suddenly made such amazing remarks as "See how I peel willow bark", and now he has begun to peel the black history of the eight generations of Liu's ancestors. How old is this to make such a fierce move? This kind of action has made it hard to believe that he stood up this time to "pour out the willow" because of the original intention of promoting social justice, and at the same time it also made people seriously question his true moral standards. Now you can see that some fans have abandoned him. Can Professor Zhang show other standards once he leaves Lenovo? Let's wait and see.

finally, let's talk about the real big star "Mr. Sima". Mr Sima suffered a heavy blow in the drama of the last scene. First of all, the main battlefield was defeated, and the heavy artillery shells thrown out with confidence in the early stage turned into squibs due to low-level mistakes; The People's Daily supported Mr. Liu, and Caijing.com and Caixin Magazine directly stood in the "Tingliu camp"; Two great military advisers fell one after another. One Su Li had to go shirtless and directly challenge the Chinese Academy of Sciences because he wanted to discuss with Lenovo privately and take care of both sides. The actual result could only be bring disgrace to oneself, while the other military adviser was plagued by life style problems and was self-sufficient. What's more, some fans questioned its actual level and turned to Professor Chea Chang, another "inverted willow" general.

This series of blows made Mr. Sima's mentality somewhat unbalanced. Obviously, he didn't want to give up, and he kept saying "Will it go away?" "If I can prove that Liu is all right, I am willing to do it easily". Then I began to attack Ms. Hu of Caixin.com eagerly, and her words were fierce. As a result, she was directly removed from the platform twice. The most terrible thing is that he went to the hospital in a hurry, threw everything away when he caught it, and actually forwarded a Huawei manager Weibo, who was obviously a P picture, to attack Lenovo's 5g vote. Come on, you are a public figure, just use an unconfirmed gossip and take it out to give your opponent a big charge. Are you giving him an assist? Although it was deleted soon, the bad influence has been caused. I advise Mr. Sima to calm down now, because rushing to turn over a new leaf will usually cost him more money. Of course, after all, Mr. Sima has experienced a big scene, and he still has a strong ability to adjust. He issued a soft knife that' it's my honor to meet Liu Hu' and mentioned the magical grandma Wang next door in time, which left endless imagination for the wonderful performance of this play.

Now, there is no final winner in this drama. Except some people who eat melons without any value concept and online bloggers who paralyze their empty hearts by traffic, those who really expect social progress, whether they are "Ting Liu" or "Liu Liu", are anxiously thinking about what is the deep-seated reason that triggered this sharp century public opinion war. Do we have a chance to create a win-win outcome?