According to the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 10 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, operators shall not use the following means to infringe trade secrets: (1) By stealing, inducement, coercion or other unfair means; Obtaining the right holder's business secrets by legitimate means; (2) disclosing, using or allowing others to use the right holder's business secrets obtained by means of the preceding paragraph; (3) violating the agreement or violating the right holder's requirements for keeping business secrets, disclosing, using or allowing others to use the right holder's business secrets. Allow others to use trade secrets in their possession. If a third party knowingly or should have known about the illegal acts listed in the preceding paragraph obtains, uses or discloses the business secrets of others, it shall be deemed as infringement of business secrets. Company Y infringed on other people's trade secrets by improperly obtaining and using K Company's R&D formula. Deng's behavior also constituted infringement of other people's trade secrets. Therefore AB's statement is correct. The non-compete obligation is formed between the employee and the employer through the labor contract or a separate non-compete agreement. Therefore, Deng’s behavior constitutes a violation of the non-compete obligation, but Company Y does not.