Original lenses are preferred. 85 1.4 GM, 70-200 2.8 GM, 24-70 2.8 GM are all good choices. Sigma e-mount ART fixed focus series is also available.

It is recommended to use metabones or Sigma mc11 adapter ring to adapt Canon mount lenses to ensure rapid focusing. You can choose Canon 85mm, 50mm, etc. However, since the native mount has lenses with similar image quality and similar cost performance, unless you have a Canon lens, the transfer is of little significance.

1. Sony FE 24-240mm F3.5-6.3 OSS JD.com price: 4799

Because the Sony A7 series has many models and targets different audiences, I also make them based on different uses. recommend. The first thing I want to recommend is the lens aimed at the tourist crowd, the 24-240. Some people think that lenses with large zoom ratios are rubbish...but in the face of travel needs, it is the absolute truth to see the world with one lens. It is light and easy to use and covers a wide range of focal lengths. The most important thing is to have your own anti-shake. If you choose the most cost-effective A7 and use this lens, you can anti-shake all over the world. The full-frame travel is extremely cost-effective. Dislike that the maximum aperture of this lens is not wide enough? If the aperture were one stop wider, it would definitely be in the tens of thousands. Besides, what's the use of keeping the high feeling? In short, 24-240 is definitely the first choice for full-frame mirrorless cameras when traveling.

2. Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS JD price: 7799

The 70-200mm focal length is a must-have for every manufacturer, and it is also one of the most popular focal lengths for photographers. . The Sony 70-200F4 lens does not have many advantages in terms of price, but it is absolutely outstanding in terms of performance. The optical structure and mechanical design are both at a professional level, and the maximum aperture F4 design also allows the lens size and price to be effectively controlled. The 70-200 with a maximum aperture of F2.8 is reserved for the same GM lens, but the price difference of more than 10,000 makes people feel that there should be a non-anti-shake version of the 70-200F2.8 priced at over 10,000. Then That’s a story for later. At present, the 70-200 F4 is overall the best choice for this focal length, suitable for portraits, landscapes and other subjects.

3. Sony Sonnar T* FE 35mm F2.8 ZA JD price: 3899

Many A7 series users have an artistic heart and do not want to hold it too much If you want to choose a lens that is compact and has a wide range of applications, I would recommend the Zeiss 35 2.8 lens. The 35mm focal length is a well-known focal length. It is very suitable for humanities, portraits, sketches, and street photography. The lens structure of 7 elements in 5 groups uses 3 aspherical lenses, which is quite luxurious. Needless to say, the imaging effect, coupled with the golden signature of Zeiss, makes it both elegant and meaningful to use.

4. Sony FE 50mm F1.8 JD price: 1699

If I could only choose one lens for the A7 series, which one would I choose? Not 24-240, but 50 1.8 that may be ignored by many people. This lens is not cheap among the 50 1.8 lenses of various brands, but not many add aspherical lenses to this lens. As the quality goes up, the price will naturally be higher. The advantage of the 50 1.8 is that it is a very good lens for both learning photography and daily use. It's easy to shoot portraits, street photos, food, family photos and night scenes. It's suitable for users who don't pursue too much visual impact and focus on taking good pictures of the things in front of them.

5. Sony FE 85mm F1.8 JD price: 3899

Like taking portraits, but always feel that the background blur is not smooth enough? I would recommend another 85 1.8 lens. This should be the most beautiful bokeh lens you can buy from Sony for less than 4,000. The 85mm portrait head is a natural portrait tool, suitable for shooting partial close-ups of portraits, gourmet dishes, street photography and night photography. For the 85 1.8, the asking price of 4,000 is not bad, it is not outrageous, and it uses an ED lens to correct chromatic aberration, and the image quality is good.