Internet slang? It comes from a compulsory language course for contemporary Internet workers. To put it simply, it complicates some relatively simple concepts to make people sound confused, such as: empowerment, closed loop, granularity, combination boxing,

The sentences composed of these words are very difficult to read, and they are often heard from some managers, so some migrant workers are very disgusted with them, but there is nothing they can do about it.

Later, as this kind of slang spread, netizens would also deliberately imitate such words to make a living.

For example, when you go to a food shop to eat omakase, you can say that eating seafood requires "preserving the deliciousness of the ingredients by destroying the cells", and then the perspective is of the chef using a knife to cut the flowers.

When writing a comment on something, you can also say: What is your underlying logic? Where is the top-level design? How to form an effective closed loop? The following is a collection of Internet slang copywriting and grammar compiled for you. First, remember the following words

: Two-word verb: review, empower, support, precipitate, push back, implement, connect in series, collaborate, feed back, be compatible, package, reorganize, fulfill, respond, quantify, layout, linkage, segment, sort out, output, accelerate

, build, support, fuse, aggregate, integrate, benchmark, focus, grasp, dismantle, abstract, explore, refine, get through, penetrate, understand, migrate, distribute, package, radiate, surround, complex

Use, penetrate, expand, develop, solidify, create, build, decouple, integrate, align, align, focus, give, get, stick to three-character nouns: perception, methodology, combination

Four-character nouns: punch, tipping point, point, line, surface, refinement, differentiation, platform, structure, influence, coupling, convenience, consistency, end-to-end, short, flat, fast, moat, experience, and granularity:

Life cycle, value transformation, strengthening cognition, resource tilt, improving logic, abstraction and transparent transmission, reuse strategy, business model, rapid response, qualitative and quantitative, critical path, decentralization, result orientation, vertical field, attribution

How to apply analysis, experience measurement, information barrier, and resource integration?

For example, you originally asked: How are you going to solve this problem?

Now you can say: What is the underlying logic of your question?

Where is the top-level design?

What is the final value delivered?

Where is the starting point of the process?

How to ensure a closed loop of answers?

What is your highlight compared to others?

What are the advantages?

What are your thoughts and reflections?

Would it be different if I asked this question?

Before this, did you have any thoughts and reflections of your own?

How is the granularity of these questions broken down? Can it be used as a breaking point to trigger respondents to explore the key path of the question?

Others have answered, can you give back and empower them and build a team awareness ecosystem?

You only ask questions but never solve them. Do you have your own unique value?

For example, you used to just look at him in confusion and didn't dare to speak. Now you can reply to him like this: The underlying logic of our product is to open up the information barrier and create a new industry ecosystem.

The top-level design focuses on the user perception track and reaches the tipping point through differentiation and granularity.

Delivering value is to use reuse methods in vertical fields to achieve lasting benefits.

Separate transparent attribution analysis is used as a starting point to empower products, and experience measurement is used as a closed-loop evaluation criterion.

The highlight is the carrier, and the advantage is the link.

Think about the entire life cycle and improve logic to consider resource tilt.

The methodology is to combine boxing to reach platform standards.