Debate: the argument that people live happily for themselves. People live happily for themselves. In this life, people don't live for themselves, but for whom. Of course, we can live happily for ourselves. Nowadays, there are so many successful people in society. They live for themselves, engage in their favorite occupations and live their own lives. From Bill Gates to Jack Ma, when you see them, who is not happy to live for themselves and who is living for others. Just like Zhuangzi, he was invited to be an official in the DPRK several times, but he refused. No one will deny Zhuangzi's talent, but being an official is not his ideal. He still likes the life of wandering wild cranes, because he lives to be happy for himself. People only live for themselves, and live happily and fully. This is our life.
Harvard University once initiated a discussion about a graduate of this school. After graduation, the man didn't work in a big company, but bought a small house by the lake to live by himself. Harvard University once discussed this incident, but in the final analysis, it was all that person's choice. In his opinion, this is the way to make himself happy, so he chose this way. I forgot the name of this person, but I did read about it in a magazine. Youth Digest also published a similar article. Gao Feixia, a woman who graduated from Harvard, naturally entered a big company in Silicon Valley after graduation, but returned to China after working for one year, bought a small house, planted flowers and wrote articles by herself. Maybe her salary is not as high as before, but it is what she longs for. We don't deny that he may make better contributions by continuing to work, but we don't really think that happy work is exhausting and disgusting, and the future will be even sadder.
The other party thinks that people are happy for others. Well, I want to ask if the other debater has a boyfriend or girlfriend. So if your father or mother doesn't like your boyfriend or girlfriend and wants you to break up, will you break up without hesitation according to this principle?
Now that your company is in crisis, your boss wants you to do something that will hurt others but save the company. Do you do it for others or not?
That's all. Let's see if I can help you.
Regarding debate, the most selfish people in the world are those who claim to live for others.
The most selfless people in the world are those who claim to live for themselves.
All life created by God is an individual, endowed with unique appearance and nature, free will and a set of physiological systems, and endowed with a completely different mission from others. As human beings, everyone has his own destiny, life and life trajectory, and only the mutual differences between lives constitute the richness and diversity of the world.
It is God's arrangement to make every life live wonderfully. Suppressing nature, or depriving others of their nature to deceive or force others to live according to their own wishes, is extremely selfish and cruel, and also deviates from the path of God.
As long as everyone lives for themselves, everything will be in good order, everyone will look like they are living a high life, and they will live an easy life. When everyone lives not for themselves, but for others, they will live very tired, not only for themselves, but also for the people they serve.
Everyone should live for himself and be responsible for himself. Only when everyone is responsible for himself can the whole mankind enter a harmonious state. If everyone lives for others and is responsible for others, the whole mankind will be chaotic and miserable.
In fact, there are no people in the world who live entirely for others. Even the greatest people, Christ Jesus and Buddha Sakyamuni, live for themselves, not for others. Objectively for others, subjectively for yourself, to achieve yourself and complete your mission.
I, Xuefeng, the founder of the temple of life, founded the temple of life to save mankind from suffering and create an era of the temple of life for all mankind. In order to achieve myself, ostensibly for mankind, but in essence for myself. "Saints are selfless and become private", the more selfless I am, the more I can achieve myself; The more selfish I am, the less I will live and lose myself. So, I live for myself, I am responsible for myself, and I don't live for others. I'm not worried about others, and I'm not responsible for others. Of course, I don't need others to live for me, and I don't need others to be responsible for me.
Every parent gives birth to a child, not for the children, but for themselves. For the sake of their children, all parents will never forcibly bring their children into this miserable world without their consent or any agreement with them. Taking care of children, raising children, and creating conditions for children to receive the best education are ostensibly for children, but in essence for themselves, satisfying their own desires, and getting what they need from children, such as experiencing the feeling of being parents, such as honoring their ancestors and letting children inherit their own heritage, such as providing for the elderly, and so on. Some children don't want to get married, and parents "earnestly" want their children to get married. what is the purpose? It's all parents for themselves. Anyone who forces others, anyone who imposes his will on others, is completely selfish. He is definitely not a man who lives for others. The more he sings "I did it for your own good", the more he hides his extreme selfishness.
No matter how loving the husband and wife are, they are essentially for themselves. Is there a husband who lives entirely for his wife? Is there a wife who lives entirely for her husband? Really? Of course not.
Are there any emperors, presidents and chairmen who live entirely for the people? Of course not. In order to win the people's favor, to stabilize our country and to maintain our position, we must serve the people. The more you do for the people, the more you will gain. This is known to all, and it is tacit to each other.
When a person says, "I didn't do this for myself, but for the people." Or when I say, "I'm doing this for your own good," I'm cheating and fooling the public, cheating and fooling others, looking for scapegoats for my incompetence, passing on my incompetence and guilt, trying to control others, trying to impose my will and desire on others, mentally and spiritually abusing others, adding mental and spiritual burdens to others through emotional means, and shirking my responsibilities.
Be realistic, tell the truth, don't be hypocritical, don't cheat, everyone lives for himself and must be responsible for himself, don't keep saying that he lives for others and is responsible for others.
From this, it can be concluded that when a person says, "I did it for your own good," he is definitely not telling the truth and is a liar.
It can be concluded that when a person says "I live for you", he must be incompetent, greedy, selfish and cruel.
Someone said, "I want to be universal." Bullshit. Why do you want everything? Everything is running in the Tao, do you still need "Purdue"?
-Excerpt from "The Palace of Life"
Is the person alive happy? People live happily on their own basis.
If you are unhappy when you are alive, what if you let others live and be happy?
You should live for your own happiness!
It turns out! If you are unhappy, will others be happy? For example:
One day, you met a very sad person and asked you, "Are you happy?" How do you answer him or her? Unhappy! Answer him (her) like this? He (she) is already very unhappy. Do you want to put salt on her (his) wound? Do you think this is the way to answer? Would you feel better if you knew how to talk like this? Have you thought about his (her) psychological endurance?
So my point is: be happy for your own happiness, and then you can make others happy for others and yourself.
Debate topic. People live to be happy: v.youku./v _ show/id _ xmte5ootgji4.
Debate Competition: Whether people live happily for themselves or others, we urgently ask both sides to have a debate! Who put forward this debate! Master! This problem can be described as interlocking! I really want to take part in this debate! What else! Landlord, you need me to enter at least 2W for your 20 points! Besides, you may not be able to tidy it up for you! We can take a long time to prepare! You choose one side, let's debate first, and then exchange roles! The winner of this question! You must really know how to be happy! Understand the law of happiness! Arguing just for the sake of arguing will kill you!
The theme of the debate is to live happily for yourself. We have just read the debate. Haha, I think it will help to give you my statement.
The so-called happiness is to feel happy and satisfied, and it is a physical and mental reaction. And the standard of happiness is that your needs are met. What is living for yourself? This is the innate skill of human beings and the skill of survival. In short, think of yourself first. You can say that living for yourself is selfish and living for others is noble, but happiness is only your own feeling. You live for yourself and die for yourself, so it is true and reliable to be happy for yourself. The so-called consideration for others, in the final analysis, is to gain the respect of others and win the recognition of society. , that is, to survive and gain a foothold in this society.
Moreover, whenever a person encounters something, he will think about the way to deal with it with his brain and then implement it. This is undoubtedly a kind of self-realization. It can be seen that whether mentally or physically, people live for themselves, and when our needs are met, we will feel happy. According to the survey of psychologists, egoists are more likely to feel happy than others.
In social communication, everyone will respect others and communicate with others in a smooth way. What is this for? Just to let others recognize themselves and get respect, which is what we call social needs. When these needs are met, we are obviously happy to live for ourselves. In our career and work, we will work tirelessly and conscientiously. Yes, more people are working for other people's companies and enterprises. However, are they happy in working for others? The answer is no. Think about it. Face to face with the boss's strict system and strict requirements, they are still in danger of being fired at any time. Can they be happy? Of course, there are also such a group of people walking in the ranks of people's public servants, serving the public and passing on happiness. In the final analysis, only when we live happily can we make others happy. No matter where happiness comes from and who gives it, we all believe that happiness is given to ourselves in different ways.
On the other hand, we all have our own emotional world. Caring for, caring for, containing and encouraging the people we love are all manifestations of respecting self-awareness, realizing self-worth and satisfying self-needs. For example, in front of family and friendship, we care and respect each other, and in front of love, we encourage each other. In essence, we all meet our spiritual and material, psychological and physical needs in different ways, so we feel happy and satisfied. For others, we live happily for ourselves, even happier. When our needs are met, we have no reason to be unhappy. Therefore, people are happy for those who live for themselves.
I must have worked hard to organize it myself. I hope it is useful to you ~ Finally, I wish you success ~ Come on ~
Debate: People are happy when they are alive, and I think they are lucky when they are alive, so as long as I am alive, I must face everything with optimism and gratitude! So I think the argument should be on the word "alive"! As for the opposing side, I think we should start with ourselves! I hope my answer is useful to you! Promote your outlook on life! Ha ha! )^_^!
Debate theme: He who seeks material things for his own happiness is the master of life. We live for ourselves and are happy for ourselves. If we can't even take care of ourselves, how can we talk about others? Don't we shop, entertain and enjoy ourselves for our own satisfaction?
There is another saying, that is, "Every man for himself, and the devil takes the hindmost". We all live for ourselves!
Go your own way and let others chase you! Isn't happiness enough?
Live and be happy for yourself!
Debate draft: Live, be happy for yourself [please help]! ! ! People should live for themselves, live for themselves, don't go against their wishes, make themselves comfortable, and don't care about the eyes of others. .
Just like a sentence,' Go your own way and let others talk'. .