Chess, even in human history, has happened countless times. The weak side has a greater advantage than the one who can't lose, but the Jedi counterattack. Aside from the mysterious forces in the East and other factors, there are generally only three possibilities for this kind of thing: first, the disadvantaged party is unlucky; Second, the so-called advantage is actually an illusion and a misjudgment; Third, the dominant party made a huge mistake. Most chess games, including Go, have no luck problems, so let's not consider the first one. Li Shishi's first match against Alfa was actually the second case. In the middle set, watching the live broadcast said that as long as Li Shishi didn't make mistakes, he basically wouldn't lose. The conclusion of recovery after the next meeting is that the advantage is actually on Alpha's side. This leads to a very serious conclusion: human judgment may be far from the real situation. If an extremely clever computer can judge the real situation, then the situation in its eyes is likely to be completely different from what you see. How different is this situation? It is likely that when people think they have an advantage, extremely clever computers think that people have lost. If two people continue to play chess at this time, they can still go back and forth, but in the eyes of extremely smart computers, this is just a peck at each other. Let me give you an example from StarCraft: StarCraft 2 Super AI Dream-level micromanipulation dog rushes to the tank array 100 dog rushes to 20 well-built tank arrays, who will win? If someone comes to play, the tank wins by a big score; If it were a computer, the puppy would win by a big margin. People will think that tanks have unlimited advantages, but if both sides operate perfectly, tanks have no chance at all. So what if the dominant party makes a mistake? Of course, an extremely clever computer should not make mistakes. Alpha is not particularly clever. He made a mistake in the fourth inning. Of course, it was smart and soon realized its own disadvantages. Then how did it come off? It's chaos. Why? Because its learning process involves a lot of games with itself, it acquiesces that it is playing chess with another opponent who is close to being extremely clever. An extremely clever opponent will not make mistakes; An extremely clever chess player will not dig a hole for his opponent, because he knows that an extremely clever opponent will not jump. So it doesn't matter if you mess around, anyway, you are struggling anyway; As long as you don't make mistakes on the other side, you will lose either way. . So here is a question to think about: if there is a trick, you play it like this, as long as it is handled correctly, you will win. But if there is a little deviation in the middle of the opposite side, you will win immediately. So, would you do that? Or simply, will you sell a flaw to the other side? Anyway, extremely smart computers don't. Guan Yu killed many opponents with a trailer, but if it was a smart computer, he would directly cut soldiers from it.