This shows that the TG is still behind the old US in terms of propellant, and the range takes a bit of a beating. This can also be seen from the air-to-air missiles

From the guide technology, from the public information, HHQ10 with infrared and passive radar dual-mode guidance path, which is also the United States of America's Hiram Block0 technology

And the latest Hiram Block3 has canceled the passive radar, and will be upgraded to the infrared guidance of the 128 * 128 thermal imaging guidance, more advanced

The TG is also the most popular of the air-to-air missiles, but the TG's range is a bit shorter than others. Imaging guidance, more advanced

So it looks like the HHQ10 is roughly equivalent to the level of the Hiram Block 0, weaker than the latest Block 3

Load capacity, it is the TG to get more, the missile launcher box made bigger, can hold more

Secondly, the anti-submarine torpedo tubes you mentioned

Personally I think the main consideration is the mechanics

It is also a good idea to use the HHQ10 as an anti-submarine torpedo tubes, because it is not a good choice. The main consideration is the mechanics

Now with the zigzag distribution, the top tube has two support points, but if it is a quadruple mount, the top tube has only one support point, and the tube is easy to be deformed under the effect of gravity

On the other hand, from the hitting point of view, the hitting rate of the anti-submarine torpedo is now around 80%, and with a three-shot salvo, the hitting rate is at 94%; The probability of hitting is 98% for a four-round salvo, which is a limited improvement and too expensive

So it's better to use a simple triple-loading structure