First, the star's income is many times higher than the social average, and he naturally has to bear his own responsibilities and obligations:
The income of an ordinary star is dozens or even hundreds of times that of ordinary people. Therefore, under the premise of high income, they naturally need to bear their due responsibilities and obligations. In the case of different social division of labor, no matter any star, he must fulfill his social responsibility, so as to get equal exchange of his salary. Just like a worker needs to work hard and work overtime, everything they do is for work, and stars also need to work hard for themselves. Therefore, society has no strict requirements for stars, but their morality and thoughts are now in a state of decline. This is the problem and one of the sticking points.
Second, the star itself is a profession, and it needs to have professional ethics after entering the professional circle. The two complement each other:
Everyone should have his own role in society. There is no doubt that stars and ordinary people have moral bottom lines. Professional ethics star is a profession. When they enter the entertainment circle, their occupation is to face a large audience. A TV play or a movie has aroused widespread concern. This is a very normal thing in itself. Entertainment stars entertain the public, so their careers must be supervised by the society, which is complementary to their careers.
Third, the survival of stars depends on the public's attention, so they need to meet social moral standards:
The survival of stars depends on the attention of the public. It is obviously unreasonable to pay attention to them and relax the requirements for them. Their social moral standards need to be improved. If there is no way to realize their moral integrity, then they should be eliminated by society, which is a mode of their professional survival.