environmental protection is the biggest problem faced by human beings in modern life. To solve this problem, we must start from the foundation. First, we must publicize a lot to raise people's awareness and understanding, and strengthen environmental awareness. Secondly, we must recycle waste, reduce the felling of forest trees, strengthen the treatment of white pollution, and use less plastic products. Finally, we must improve the cleanliness to make the city look cleaner. For the sake of the earth's tomorrow, we must start from. We should protect the environment well. Here, we put forward the following suggestions: implement garbage sorting and bagging. This will not only reduce the workload of sanitation workers, but also better utilize waste, reduce pollution and save resources. When buying food, use less plastic bags and try to use bamboo baskets. Use pens with replaceable cores as much as possible. Reduce the waste of ballpoint pen shell and the amount of garbage. Try not to use disposable lunch boxes when going out to eat. Sowing green means sowing the hope of excess garbage and environmental problems, recycling and comprehensive utilization of garbage (II) Science in the sea bathroom. Drinking water is becoming a trend now, although the media has introduced the disadvantages of drinking water more than once. However, the family of "drinking water" is still expanding day by day. Drinking water not only refers to pure water, but also includes mineral water, distilled water and even space water, etc. However, drinking tap water that we have grown up has become relatively "non-drinking water". We do not rule out that drinking water is popular at present, and speculation has played a certain role, but it reflects that the current water pollution has reached an unbearable level. It is reported that: "It is reported that a survey was conducted in 798 towns across the country in 979. The daily sewage discharge in China is 2.58 million tons for the people, of which industrial wastewater accounts for 819, and domestic sewage accounts for 1.991989. According to the survey of 854 towns in the National Congress, the daily sewage discharge reaches 36.53 billion tons, of which 551 million tons are industrial wastewater. Most of these wastewater are directly discharged without treatment, which pollutes rivers, lakes and seas. In addition, There is an indisputable fact before everyone in Shanghai. Huangpu River, the mother river of Shanghai, was a clear river with fish and shrimp before the mid-1951s (1958). In 1962, the water quality began to be polluted, and in 1963, it began to appear for 22 days. In 1988, it rose to the scene for 29 days, accounting for about 2/3 of the whole year, and the section with unqualified water quality accounted for 64.5km. It accounts for 56.99% of the total length of 113.5km. The harm of water pollution is self-evident. Water pollution and water quality deterioration have brought serious harm to human health, human life and production. Water is an important material for human survival. Clean people can bring people lush flowers, birds and flowers, quiet and comfortable, picturesque and beautiful environment, and bring people tranquility, joy and peace. But today it is polluted. Terror and disaster. In order to make life better, let the beautiful mountains and rivers stay in the world forever, and let the clear water flow continuously, people have become more and more aware of the importance of preventing water pollution. Sowing green means sowing the hope of excess garbage and environmental problems, from drinking pure water to thinking of recycling and comprehensive utilization of garbage. In 2115, an "environmental storm" blew up in the mainland of China, and 31 projects under construction with a total investment of more than RMB 179 million were built. The reason is that these projects have not been assessed by environmental impact, and they are illegal projects that have not been approved for construction. Environmental Deterioration The environmental problems in China, no way back did not begin today. As early as the 1991s, the problem of environmental pollution was very serious. Such as the Huaihe River Basin. In the 1991s, five types of water quality accounted for 81%, and the whole Huaihe River was like a huge sewage ditch all the year round. In 1995, the economic losses caused by environmental pollution reached 187.5 billion yuan. According to the calculation of Chinese Academy of Sciences, the losses caused by environmental pollution and ecological destruction have accounted for 1.5% of the total GDP, which means 9% economic growth on the one hand and 1.5% loss rate on the other. The environmental problem is not only a problem of China's sustainable development, but also a demon that devours economic achievements. At present, the desertification land in China has reached more than 2.674 million square kilometers; Cultivated land and homes with a population of nearly 411 million in 471 counties in 18 provinces and autonomous regions of China are threatened by desertification to varying degrees, and desertification is still growing at a rate of more than 1,111 square kilometers per year. Among the seven river systems, the water quality with no use value has exceeded 41%. More than 411 of the 668 cities in China are in a state of water shortage. Many of them are caused by water pollution. Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, for example, is located at the intersection of Yongjiang River, Yaojiang River and Fenghua River. However, due to water pollution, it is necessary to rely on water tankers to run around the clock when it is most short of water to transport water from rural rivers to various enterprises in the city. The average industrial added value of China is 1,111 yuan, which consumes 331 cubic meters of water and produces 231 cubic meters of sewage. Every billion yuan of GDP is created, 288,111 tons of wastewater will be discharged. There is also a lot of domestic sewage. More than 81% of them will be directly discharged into rivers without treatment. Otherwise, there will be no water available in China in 2111. 1/3 of the urban population in China breathes seriously polluted air, and 1/3 of the country is eroded by acid rain. In economically developed Zhejiang Province, the acid rain coverage rate has reached 111%. The frequency of acid rain is 11% in Shanghai and about 12% in Jiangsu. In Central China and some southern cities, such as Yibin, Huaihua, Shaoxing, Zunyi, Ningbo and Wenzhou, the frequency of acid rain exceeds 91%. In China, the maximum allowable sulfur dioxide emission for basically eliminating acid rain pollution is 1.2 million to 1.4 million tons. In 2113, the national sulfur dioxide emissions reached 21.587 million tons, an increase of 12% over 2112, of which industrial emissions increased by 14.7%. At the current rate of economic development. As well as the way and intensity of pollution control, by 2121, the sulfur dioxide emitted by thermal power plants alone in China will reach more than 21 million tons, and the total emission will exceed the atmospheric environmental capacity by more than 1 times, which will be a serious disaster for the ecological environment and people's health. On October 27th, at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, someone predicted that if it is not rectified, the sudden environmental crisis in human history will probably destroy the economic and social system the most, and it will probably appear in China in the near future. There is a saying that pollution control is in a dilemma. To control the environment while developing the economy, the investment in environmental protection must reach more than 1.5% of GDP. However, this is under the condition that environmental protection is already very good. In China, according to Shanghai's experience, to really control the environment effectively, the investment in environmental protection must account for more than 3% of GDP. In the past 21 years, China's annual investment in environmental protection was 1.5% in the first half of 1991s, and only a little more than 1% in recent years. Environmental protection is a kind of "luxury consumption", with a large investment and a small contribution to GDP. Therefore, some special funds originally used for environmental protection have also been used for other purposes. At present, China is in a dilemma on environmental issues: if it is not governed, the future cannot be guaranteed; If we really want to govern, we need large-scale investment, and the immediate economy is unbearable. It has been calculated that the enterprises around Dianchi Lake in Yunnan Province have only created several billion yuan of output value in the past 21 years, but it will take at least tens of billions of yuan to initially restore the water quality of Dianchi Lake, which is the fiscal revenue of Yunnan Province for one year. Small paper mills in the Huaihe River Basin have a cumulative output value of only 51 billion yuan in 21 years. However, to control the pollution caused by it, even if the main stream reaches the minimum irrigation water standard, it needs to invest 311 billion yuan. It will not only cost a terrible number, but also take at least 111 years to restore the three kinds of water quality in the 1971s. From a microscopic point of view, in the past 21 years, domestic manufacturing industry can only tap the potential in two aspects: first, wages, and second, environmental protection, without relying on technological progress to reduce energy consumption and costs. The simplest thing, such as cement production, needs to increase the 8 yuan cost per ton of cement, accounting for 5% of the ex-factory price of cement. The textile industry discharges more than 1 billion cubic meters of wastewater every year. If it is to be treated, it will cost 1.2~1.8 yuan per ton. Increase the production cost by 5%. And most enterprises simply don't have such a high profit rate. Therefore, we can only fight guerrilla warfare on the issue of environmental protection: either we don't build any wastewater treatment facilities, or we can put the sewage into the treatment pool during the day and discharge it into the river at night when no one is around, which can save a lot of money. In the disorderly competition of the market, this 5% cost. It often determines the profit and loss, life and death of the enterprise. China's "two highs and one low" in environmental law enforcement-high cost of law-abiding, high cost of law-enforcement and low cost of illegality-also contributed to this tendency. Usually, it costs 511,111 yuan for the environmental protection department to obtain evidence of an illegal smuggling incident, and the fine that eventually falls on the illegal enterprise is only 51,111 yuan, including the so-called "environmental storm" that is blowing hard. Some mega-power station projects with billions of yuan investment started construction without authorization in violation of environmental assessment, and the final fine was only 211,111 yuan. A fine of only 211,111 yuan is simply nine Niu Yi cents for a project with an investment of over 111 million yuan. How powerful is such punishment for illegal activities? Therefore, the Environmental Protection Law has always been called the "Tofu Law". An environmental storm will involve hundreds of thousands of enterprises, which will inevitably lead to the bankruptcy of a large number of enterprises, the unemployment of a large number of people, a substantial increase in enterprise costs, and the domestic price index quickly breaking through double digits. Therefore, both macro and micro costs are actually unbearable. Four factors hinder the huge resistance of environmental governance to the environmental protection department in the process of law enforcement. Pan Yue, deputy director of the State Environmental Protection Administration, summed up four reasons: First, some places do not have a good understanding of Scientific Outlook on Development and simply pursue economic growth. Some projects with high energy consumption and heavy pollution, such as small smelting, small ferroalloy and small chemical industry, which are explicitly prohibited, have actually shown a trend of spread in some places. Secondly, in attracting investment, some local governments unilaterally emphasize simplifying examination and approval and handling relevant procedures within a time limit. No matter whether the project will be polluted or not, it will be approved as long as it is invested. In some places, there are illegal phenomena such as "the will of the head" and "getting on the bus first and buying tickets later" in the environmental impact approval of construction projects. Thirdly, the quality of EIA needs to be improved. Some EIA units do not insist on scientific evaluation, dare not speak with objective facts and scientific data, and their evaluation conclusions are vague and ambiguous. They push the conclusion of the environmental feasibility of the project to the examination and approval department, and even a few EIA units resort to fraud, fabricate or falsify data, or conceal facts, which seriously affects the implementation of the environmental impact assessment system, making environmental impact assessment a mere formality and losing the minimum scientific and fair nature of third-party consulting institutions. Finally, information disclosure and public participation are insufficient. China's current environmental impact assessment system is government-led, and it is obviously not enough to supervise a large number of construction projects with limited government power. In fact, the resistance encountered by EIA is driven by the economic interests behind it. Set off a real "environmental storm" China is a big country with little room for manoeuvre in the environment, and it is also a rising country after the global resources and markets are basically divided up. There is no possibility for China to wait until the environment is extremely bad, like some pioneering countries. However, China is also a developing country, and China will inevitably take the road of developing economy first and then controlling pollution. The history of all countries in the world has shown that there is a similar law between economic growth and environmental change: in the process of industrialization, a country will have a period of rapid growth of environmental pollution with GDP, especially in the era of heavy chemical industry; but when GDP grows to a certain extent, with the upgrading of industrial structure and the enhancement of residents' willingness to pay for the environment. After reaching the turning point, the pollution level will suddenly decline with the growth of GDP until the pollution level returns to below the environmental capacity, which is the so-called environmental Kuznets curve, and the development process of Japan in that year was this law. There is no doubt that it is impossible for China to cross such an era of heavy chemical industry. Because China's population is too large and the country is too big, it can't directly enter the high-tech era with the help of the global division of labor, like Finland, when its manufacturing industry is underdeveloped. At the end of 1991s, the author once went back to his hometown in southern Jiangsu. The scene when I was a child, when the river was clear and I could reach four townships and eight towns by boat, is gone forever. To my surprise, the main factor causing this situation is the most common domestic garbage. In China, even if the industry is not developed, the pollutants brought by population growth are enough to make the environment worse to an intolerable level. Even to control such pollution, it needs a large investment and an economic foundation. China has a long way to go in pollution control, and it needs to act according to law to stop the occurrence of vicious environmental incidents and slow down the pace of environmental deterioration. 3. What kind of environmental protection concept should we hold? What kind of ecological environmental protection concept and resource development concept should we hold? Are environmental protection and resource development an irreconcilable contradiction? I think not. Because their goals are the same, they are all for the survival of mankind. Therefore, scientific eco-environmental protection and resource development can achieve unity of opposites. I believe that all people who care about environmental problems have a sincere heart for our future generations to survive better. We should not doubt those who exploit natural resources in order to make people in poverty-stricken areas get rid of poverty and get rich as soon as possible. They also have a boxing heart to ensure and improve the survival of people in poverty-stricken areas. Only those who strongly advocate protection consider the long-term survival problem of the whole mankind, while those who actively advocate development want to solve the survival problem of people in local areas at present. Do we have any reason to deprive local people of their right to survival and development? Over the years, with the propaganda efforts of various environmental protection organizations, the general public has a certain degree of environmental awareness, which is the credit of various environmental protection organizations and people, but having environmental awareness does not mean knowing environmental protection. There are still many of us who are aware of environmental protection, but out of consideration for their immediate interests and greed for enjoyment, they are unwilling to consciously abide by environmental protection standards. For example, some of us who don't have to worry about our food and clothing have promoted and stimulated the emergence and development of the wildlife trading market in order to taste the game, wear high-grade fur fashion and show off our wealth, which has made our exploitation and utilization of natural resources beyond the capacity of nature. In this process, the consumers who really should be blamed are those who have no worries about food and clothing, not those who have no food and clothing and have to ask for natural resources in order to survive, nor should they be blamed for developing and utilizing natural resources in order to get people in poverty-stricken areas out of trouble as soon as possible. Why did environmental problems not attract people's attention at least before the industrial revolution, but now it has become a global urgent problem that is increasingly affecting human survival? This is because in the past, human's demand for natural resources and all kinds of garbage produced have not exceeded the tolerance of nature, but now, human's over-exploitation and utilization of nature and a large number of domestic and industrial garbage have exceeded the tolerance of nature. How did this happen? It is the constant pursuit of material and spiritual enjoyment after solving the problem of food and clothing. Be thorough