Because the company's operation does not meet the requirements, does not meet the health and safety standards, and is not provided for employees free of charge as the online media said, law enforcement officers found that the lunch provided by the company for employees actually needs to be charged. Since charging is a business, you need a food business license. However, the company did not provide documents and refused to be investigated by law enforcement officers. Naturally, it will be fined 50,000.

1. A company in Haikou was fined 50,000 for providing lunch. After Haikou Municipal Market Supervision Administration announced the decision on administrative punishment for this company, some of them forwarded the incident from the media, stealing the concept and distorting the meaning of the document, which triggered discussion among netizens. After all, in the eyes of many people, the act of providing free lunch to employees is truly humanized. Why should I be subject to administrative punishment?

In fact, the company was punished not because it provided free lunch for its employees, but because its sanitary conditions could not meet the requirements of food production and processing, and the person in charge of the company did not cooperate with the investigation and provided false information. If the circumstances are bad, a fine of 50 thousand yuan will be imposed.

It is reported that the canteen chef of this company is only the personal nanny of the person in charge of the company. Not only does he have no health certificate, but he also wears slippers and a mask when cooking. The sanitary environment of the kitchen can't meet the basic standards of food processing. Moreover, when law enforcement officers investigate the company's environment, some people always use interventions such as cameras on the spot and lie that they are provided free of charge.

Second, since the media sometimes have to uphold the objective principle, they are not allowed to make rumors at will. In fact, this is an ordinary administrative punishment event. It is normal for companies that fail to meet the food business standards to open canteens without permission and be punished by relevant departments. They have aroused widespread concern only because they have polished the media and misinterpreted the information in order to gain attention. This is actually a "title party" in disguise. At the moment when food safety is very important, the practice of the market supervision administration is not wrong and in line with the regulations. I hope that these self-media can always uphold the objective principle when publishing information in the future.