This is the basic requirement of the government and the masses for the behavior and appearance of public officials, and it is also the basic impression that candidates should leave on examiners when they first enter the examination room. Due to the first cause effect, if the examinee attaches importance to and meets this requirement, the examiner will give the examinee appropriate extra points in each subsequent examination item without the examinee's knowledge; On the contrary, if the examinee does not trim the edge, it will arouse the examiner's disgust, and he will not hesitate to lower the score of each test item appropriately. Therefore, candidates must pay attention to properly shaping and cultivating their own image, so that the examiner can shine at the moment, have a good impression and get extra points.
Second, look calm and modest.
This is an important requirement of the government for the mental state of public officials, because only by facing the masses with this attitude can they be better understood and accepted by the masses and their work can be better carried out. This is reflected in the interview. Candidates can not only show whether they are in line with the spirit of public officials in front of the examiner, but also show their good self-emotional control ability and psychological quality. To meet this requirement, candidates should neither be supercilious nor supercilious in the examination room, that is to say, two extreme situations should be avoided, namely, avoiding looking ahead and looking back, being obedient to Nuo Nuo and being arrogant and careless.
Third, the movements are smooth and coordinated.
Facing the diversity and complexity of things in work and life, public officials not only need to be calm psychologically, but also need to be practical and capable in action, which not only shows the rich cultivation of public officials, but also is an important condition for their efficient work. According to this principle, we require candidates to knock at the door, enter the door, close the door, walk, stand, bow, sit, write, get up, leave the seat, go out and close the door in an orderly and consistent manner, leaving people with the impression of being busy but not chaotic, smart and steady, which is recognized by the examiner.
Fourth, the response is timely and natural.
The emerging new things in modern society determine the novelty and variability of the problems faced by public officials. To solve these problems, we must make accurate and rapid judgments and take decisive and effective measures. This quality must meet the following requirements in a short interview: candidates should respond to the examiner's short and subtle words, gestures, eyes, questions and so on. From knocking at the door to quitting. If the examinee is indifferent to the words and deeds of the examiner because of nervousness or negligence, it will make the examiner feel that he is not valued, or that the examinee is slow to respond and does not meet the basic quality of public officials.
Five, the language specification is fluent
The multi-level and extensive nature of government service objects determines that its members can not only accurately convey the content and spirit of major policies, but also effectively exchange ideas only with strong language expression ability. In the interview, candidates are required to express their thoughts in standardized, accurate, fluent and orderly language, so that the examiner can sound relaxed and happy and effectively show his style and charm. On the contrary, improper use of network language and dialect archaism will not only undermine the standardization and coherence of Chinese, but also make examiners sound on pins and needles and reduce their goodwill towards candidates.
Sixth, the voice is loud and fluctuating.
The mental outlook of public officials is reflected in their voices to some extent. In the interview, especially in the answering session, because examiners have to accept a lot of information with the same content in a short time, their brains will fall into a state of short circuit or numbness under certain conditions. Therefore, only through a loud and rhythmic voice can candidates effectively stimulate the examiner's nerves, thus paying attention to the content and state of candidates' answers; On the contrary, for those candidates with soft voice and straight intonation, it will make the examiner listen to the questions with difficulty and vagueness, and draw the conclusion that the respondents are poor in spirit and vague in thinking, thus denying the quality of the candidates.
Seven, clear and reasonable thinking
It is an eternal task for public officials to effectively analyze and solve various social problems. In order to achieve this effect, they must have very clear and reasonable ideas. This requires candidates in the interview: on the one hand, they can quickly sort out the basic ideas that can show their language characteristics according to the effective information in the topic, so that the examiner can easily understand their own ideas; On the other hand, we can highlight the characteristics of various types of questions, such as cognitive class should show people with emotion, communication class should be kind to others and take care of the overall situation, organization class should plan ahead and make full use of people, emergency class should be balanced, prioritize, and analysis class should be clear and dialectical. Only in this way can we explain our ideas reasonably.
Eight, the content is substantial.
Seeking truth and being pragmatic is the most important working method and style put forward by the state for public officials. In the interview, it is reflected that the candidates stick to the given questions in the process of answering questions, not only grasp the intention of the questions as a whole, but also dig deep into the key information, and use them properly, closely link with reality, and effectively express their views and handling strategies on the questions. On the contrary, if you deviate from the meaning of the question, although you are eloquent, you will be confused; If we copy the policy, although it is quite satisfactory, it is also empty. All these will make the examiner deny the candidates in methods and ideas and reduce the benign evaluation of the candidates.
Finally, we emphasize that the above-mentioned "eight iron laws" are the rigid requirements for the preparation of public office interviews from a macro perspective. Candidates can truly understand and follow these rules only by practicing a lot in strict accordance with their own requirements and constantly summarizing them, thus providing strong support for the success of the interview in the examination room.