1, ChatGPT has a good degree of completion for repetitive work, so it can replace part of the work of bottom-level programmers.
It is undeniable that ChatGPT is more efficient and accurate in completing repetitive tasks. ..... It can quickly retrieve more accurate code and complete it, which greatly improves the work efficiency in this area. ..... In this respect, ChatGPT is indeed more efficient than the bottom-level programmers and can replace their work in this respect.
2. The code written by 2.ChatGPT is not perfect, so it can't completely replace the work of low-level programmers.
Although ChatGPT can change the code, at present, the code it writes is not perfect and even has great problems. ..... Specifically, for ordinary people, the code written by ChatGPT is beautiful. But for professionals, we can find many mistakes in the code written by ChatGPT. So ChatGPT can't completely replace the bottom programmers in this respect.
3. Because ChatGPT is not innovative enough, it will not make the bottom programmers lose their jobs.
Compared with low-level programmers, ChatGPT's biggest disadvantage is its lack of innovation ability. ..... Specifically, the given task can only be completed on the basis of existing knowledge, but there are shortcomings in innovation ability. This makes it impossible for ChatGPT to completely replace the work of the bottom programmers, and it will not make the bottom programmers unemployed. ..... But it is entirely possible for ChatGPT to partially replace the work tasks of the bottom-level programmers, so the work status of the bottom-level programmers will change because of the appearance of ChatGPT.