I said that reading and traveling are different ways to acquire knowledge. If you want to succeed, you must read thousands of books first, and theory should guide practice. Please, friends on the other side, don't just walk with your head down, but also show your face to my handwriting, and don't make a gesture casually to stop us scholars from doing things.
Objection (2) Knowledge comes from the experience world.
Refutation: Because we are going to debate the relationship between reading and traveling, rather than who is the mother of reading and traveling, the statement of knowledge and experience put forward by the opposing side is based on the wrong interpretation of the topic and deviates from the debate, which is meaningless. By the way, I would like to make a point here: the book is really a summary of the experience of practitioners, and the first book may have been bred by taking the Wan Li Road. However, after a long period of development and accumulation, in modern society, you can choose between studying in thousands of books and taking Wan Li Road. How do you choose?
This book was written by someone who walked through Wan Li Road. Why write a book and spread it? Isn't it just to spread experience and let future generations take fewer detours? Misindication is as important as a road sign.
Objection (3) The order formed by thousands of years in the world is the most precise and natural. Its existence is not the result of "theory" guidance. The existence of theory only explains the world, and its function is limited.
Refutation: Human beings have a very strong practical ability and the ability to transform the world, and it is precisely because of the blind practice of those who have not mastered the theoretical knowledge of environmental protection that the present environment has deteriorated. China put forward requirements for local leaders at all levels to learn from foreign sustainable development theories, attach importance to environmental protection and ensure the sustainability of economic development. At present, some cities have basically achieved sustainable economic development, beautiful environment and people living and working in peace and contentment through re-planning. One-some places are still blindly engaged in the economy, with excessive resources, continuous floods and landslides, increasingly serious industrial pollution and urban pollution, a vicious circle, and the people's living and production conditions are deteriorating day by day, with quite serious consequences.
Third, summarize the arguments of the opposing side to refute our point of view.
To the contrary (1), you can gain more and better knowledge by going to Wan Li Road, which is more real, deeper and wider than reading thousands of books.
Refutation: First of all, I suggest to Yue Ming that "film and television means do not belong to the category of reading, and prefer to take the Wan Li Road in another way". Simply put, reading thousands of books is another way to take Wan Li Road.
I reiterate, "in modern society, the carrier of knowledge is no longer just printed matter, but television, radio, especially the computer network called the information superhighway."
"Wan Li Road is a direct way to try, practice and gain experience; Reading thousands of books is a way to study and learn the experience summarized by others and gain experience indirectly. " If the other party has any objection, please explain. Back to the topic, the opponent says that people learn by reading, and there are physical obstacles such as remembering, reading and reciting books. The knowledge in the world is vast, just as people can't travel all over the world and do things for all mankind. People only need to master what they need and do what they can, but they can't overcome the problems of not remembering, reading and endorsing. But what is the biggest physical obstacle to human practice? It is short-lived!
You dare not read or learn the books summarized by predecessors with your life. Do you want to practice them again with your limited life?
The ancients said that "it is better to believe in books than to have no books", not "it is better to believe in books than to have no books". "Doing" means not relying on it completely and absolutely. In fact, everything is the same, not just reading. In practice, sometimes you will come to a dead end. "It's too superficial to talk on paper" is unrealistic, life is limited, and we can't do it ourselves; The murder of intellectuals does not prove that "reading makes people understand, but you can't be a man without reading." The fact is that the lower the education level, the higher the crime rate. Counterevidence (2) It's wrong to read thousands of books before you can do a good job in Wan Li Road. Going to Wan Li Road can make people do the next Wan Li Road better than reading thousands of books.
Refutation: (1) Xiang must be a good girl who likes to make cakes, but I want to know whether Xiang came up with the method of making cakes directly or learned it indirectly from recipes, TV and other people's mouths. From the correct selection and processing of raw materials such as grains, livestock and poultry, vegetables and fruits, baking soda, to the correct selection of cooking methods such as frying, frying, stewing, boiling and stewing, it goes without saying that it is best to learn basic knowledge before practicing, or to explore experiments by yourself. If Xiang is a genius, he can go beyond the history of food development for thousands of years and make his own cake. Even a delicious sweet potato cake will take you most of your life. Do you still have the life and energy to invent egg tarts?
(2) manstein's speech on the 67th floor also fully proved our view that "to do a good job in Wan Li Road, you must read thousands of books". Excerpts are as follows:
Manstein: "It is because of these books and the teacher's enlightenment that I can accumulate knowledge at a very fast speed. Through a year of junior high school education, the effect is definitely much better than that of the ancients for thousands of years. At this point, we not only do not deny it, but also encourage everyone to receive school education in a big way in order to fill their brains with knowledge and rationality. "
Before planning to investigate the taxes and fees of farmers in Guangxi, manstein carefully read "1Finance and Taxation of China in the Ming Dynasty in the 6th century" and consulted all previous tax laws dating back to the Qin and Han Dynasties. Go out for a field trip when you are ready. (3) Xiao Xiaotong ㊣flying said in the 7 1 building: "Newton always said, don't feel how great you are, I am standing on the shoulders of giants. What is this giant's shoulder? What is "thousands of books"? Is it the theory you are determined to pursue? Don't! It is the careful observation of countless great astronomers like Copernicus and Bununo. This is a panoramic view of the earth marked by great navigators such as Columbus and Magellan. It is a "new frontier" for countless great scientific pioneers to rush to various scientific research fields.
The result of the frontier)! "
Opponents often cite the example of scientists to show that the giant's shoulder is not "thousands of books". How did Newton come into contact with other scientific theories or the great achievements of other scientists when he studied apples? Did Copernicus, Bununo, Columbus and Magellan take Newton to see the stars and the moon and cross the sea together? Didn't it spread indirectly to Newton through their great works?
Third, suggest that the other party see clearly the concepts and viewpoints of our argument and put forward his own argument accurately. I won't mention my argument, just start with a vague "not as good as". When I got there, I counted there. At the same time, I don't look at each other's arguments, and I don't refute ours. I just argue around some examples that I don't know what to explain. A little bit of that Hehe, from such a big debate to the end, the other debater can only use "speaking like a book"! What verbs, nouns, and "do" notes are all out! Why is the topic of debate in this issue: It is better to read thousands of books than Wan Li Road.
Instead of the argument repeatedly emphasized by the other party: the direct way to acquire knowledge VS*** indirect * *, how much is it?
Even the level of this debate is biased. How can we win? Of course, acquiring knowledge is only a small part of this debate. How can the opposing debater take such a small part as the nature of the debate?
There are too many repetitive topics, so I won't repeat them here. I want to ask my opponent, what is the purpose of reading? Is it to gain knowledge and experience? What is knowledge and experience for? Did you finally fall on "use"? That is-that is, "apply what you have learned." Thus, the most fundamental and important thing is "use", that is, practice. On this basis, we also encourage reading more, standing on the shoulders of giants to practice opening the way, but it is understood by the other debater that it is better to read thousands of books than to agree with their arguments. What logic is this? At first, I was reminded not to look at the problem in isolation, but when debating the problem in isolation, the other party came to an unknown "steal", which was ridiculous!
What is even more puzzling is that at first, we didn't see any doubts from our opponent's argument, but we started a debate on the basis of this argument. At the end of the debate without foundation, the other side's argument gave a-the most fundamental negation. What logic is this?
The opponent finally understood that in fact, our argument is about "not as good as", which is very good. The ancients said, "It's not too late to admit defeat."
We know that people exist in the world with practical actions, such as eating, sleeping, walking, working, or going through these troublesome things by ourselves, and no one can do it for us. So it can be said that "Wan Li Road" is the basic condition for people to be human. In this sense, opponents think they are right.
Without practice, we can't live. However, I want to emphasize two points here. First, as human beings, we should consider how to develop. Not only for individuals, but also for society, we need progress. Man-how can human beings make progress? According to the experience revealed by the history of knowledge communication, in ancient times, an individual, a collective or an organization with advanced skills and ideas was bound to have a more favorable position and gain more benefits than other individuals, collectives or organizations in the process of social evolution. Then, this individual, collective or organization who has mastered advanced skills and ideas spreads their skills and ideas through practical actions such as war, trade and missionary work. However, other individuals, collectives or organizations have gradually accepted this advanced skill and concept through comparative screening, which is more conducive to the popularization of human beings and human evolutionary knowledge. With the development of modern human society, the transmission and dissemination of knowledge is no longer limited to specific practical behavior. Now we can learn advanced knowledge through various information carriers including books. Of course, personal practice-"Wan Li Road"-is still one of the effective ways to acquire knowledge, but you can't help but admit that the appearance of books has greatly broadened human horizons, enabling human beings to jump out of the narrow experience framework of what you see is what you get, absorb advanced knowledge more extensively and quickly, and thus keep up with the pace of the times. This is why printing is called one of the greatest inventions. Therefore, we can say that when human beings are still in the stage of ignorance, practice-"walking Wan Li Road"-is more important than "reading thousands of books", but when knowledge is created and summarized in the form of books, it is wise to first obtain more knowledge from books to guide practical behavior.
Second, considering our argument about specific individuals in the real society, generally speaking, opponents think that "reading thousands of books" or "taking the Wan Li road" is more conducive to the promotion of individuals' status in society? The answer should be self-evident. We have been taught since childhood that "reading more will lead to a better life". I believe opponents have heard many such lessons. If you don't study hard, you want to go out and travel around the world, and you want to "take the Wan Li Road". I'm sure your parents will twist your ears and hit you with their old fists-hey, what wise parents! I can give you an example here. For example, Mr. Li Ka-shing, the richest Chinese in the world, is a well-known fact that he didn't really read many gobbledygook when he was a child, and he created such a brilliant career by his own efforts. But in an exclusive interview with satellite TV, Teacher Li told the truth: "I didn't read any books when I was a child, so now I read books whenever I have time. I used to read and study while working. " Now I basically read more than a dozen books a month, including finance, business management and literature. It is very useful to learn from others' experience in managing enterprises. "For example, I remember a vice principal (I can't remember the specific name, female) in Tongfang, Tsinghua, who gave me four books per month. These examples are very useful for enlightening opponents' paranoid thinking, that is, doing business is of course a very practical thing, but in the final analysis, we still have to rely on reading and get more extensive knowledge from books. In addition, use the opposing side to demonstrate nstein.
In other words, Li Ka-shing is a hero in the ordinary world, and we "most people are real mortals, living on the ground". If you want to think better, you'd better read a good book first!
Having said that, it suddenly occurred to me that there is a ready-made example available here, that is, the nstein of the cube.
Mr. Chairman, I really admire his profound knowledge in the debate. However, do you think that he personally practiced it and consulted the sages such as Wang Mang, Toyotomi Hideyoshi and Kant to argue with us? Or did it take many important events in history to say so much? Don't! Just learn from books! If the opponent wins this debate, it just proves that the role of "reading thousands of books" is far greater than the role of our star's "practice" ("Take the Wan Li Road"). Of course, everyone on the other side looks well-read but inexperienced. You know, our debate here is basically based on knowledge gained from books, not practice. Practice is just the action of tapping the keyboard. As for this nstein,
Not to mention Mr. Wang's joke-"Even if I don't know who built the Great Wall, when I stand on it, my sense of history will pop up." Ha ha!
The above is my argument; Let's refute the arguments and argumentation logic quoted by the opposing party.
Ernst believes that Wang Mang was killed because of his rigid thinking and reading too many dead books. Some economic systems established by "Wang Mang's restructuring" must be effective, otherwise many achievements will not last long. I don't need to say more about this historical fact. Was it because "a scholar can't work after all" that he was defeated and killed? Obviously not; His usurpation of the Han Dynasty was despised by orthodox intellectuals at that time. How can you say that he is a "thoroughly corrupt scholar"? To sum up, it seems that it is not because I read too many books, but because I didn't read too many books, didn't assess the situation, and didn't figure out what people wanted, which led to my ruin. Of course, things in the world can't be judged by learning. Real scholars are definitely not in power and can be awesome. Scholars in universities have influenced the operation of the real society through their academic theories, but there are many examples to be found: Rousseau to the French Revolution, Adam Smith to the capitalist market economy, and so-and-so to the current American neoconservatism (I haven't read many books, and I forget the names).
Einstein added, "The order that has been formed in the world for thousands of years is the most accurate and natural, and its existence is not the result of the guidance of' theory'." Of course I admit it. However, looking at the development of human history, we can know that the world has been built in this way for thousands of years, but it is definitely not spontaneous. There will always be some self-righteous guys trying to control everything! In the end, mankind was devastated, and the country was ruined. -I don't want to mention this case, as everyone knows. At this time, the role of classical theory is reflected. It is not responsible for planning and guiding the implementation of this world, but for explaining what is the most effective implementation method. So we-we know that what we think is right is actually absurd and sinful. What will happen if we still adhere to the practicalism of "the war between heaven and man" and the idealism of "how bold people are and how productive the land is"-instead of looking at the world from classic books and looking for truth?
Kant is a classic case that "reading thousands of books" is more useful than "taking the Wan Li road", but Einstein misinterpreted him as a negative example-so it is insulting to insist on it!
It seems to me that the opposing side is arguing with Yue Ming.
This argument is one of the most wonderful places. However, it has forgotten the most fundamental one, that is, "it is difficult to learn on paper, but it must be practiced", and it is precisely to draw the view on the general knowledge law of the world from paper, so it is necessary to "practice" to "know"! Here, things that are "on paper" still have a guiding role.
Finally, let me use another old saying that we China people are familiar with to educate our opponents-
Hard-working people rule people, hard-working people rule people!
The so-called "workers" are mostly guys who study; And "laborers" are basically loyal fans of "Wan Li Road" like their opponents. Although the old saying of za China sounds uncomfortable and smacks of class struggle, it is still true after so many years of reform. ...
Ok, the nuclear bomb has finally started, ok!
Originally, I was exploring the meaning of "emptiness" in Buddhism and preparing to deal with immortals.
Suddenly I heard a loud noise. It was Brother Shi's nuclear bomb!
Looking closely, I have to applaud this well-quoted, polished and well-written text! It can be seen that he did read thousands of books-he came prepared.
Using daily behavior to illustrate practice, a kind of "practice" that is divorced from books is indeed a new "Tao", but I smell the smell of "Tao" at night. How can I live up to your sentence "Where are the ancients?"
Roman Si Tong, the opposing debater.
At the beginning of 9 1 building, we talked about the spread history of knowledge, which is the same as another debater's argument at the beginning: an effective way to acquire knowledge. At this point, for example, I want to ask my opponent: when we discuss the all-round teaching development of a school, some people just discuss one class in the school and confine everything in the school to this class to summarize the all-round problems of the school. Think about it, what kind of logic is it to put the whole school in the class instead of putting the class within the school? What theory is this? Should the opposing debater seriously understand this debate?
Speaking of the second point, can you read Li Ka-shing now? Can't! Are there fewer people who read more than Li Ka-shing? Quite a lot! But why didn't Li Ka-shing do it? The other party said, can you tell me? At this point, the other debater also admitted-we are debating whether to read thousands of books or take the Wan Li Road. Does this mean that we are debating which is more important? We are not saying that we don't need to study in isolation, but that practice (taking the Wan Li road) is more important than reading. If we go back to books and enrich ourselves in practice, does this mean that reading is more important than practice? It is feasible to acquire knowledge from books, but how does it compare with practice? Furthermore, use this debate to illustrate the winning or losing of reading and traveling thousands of miles? Did the other debater read too much?
Finally, there is a rebuttal in the argument of Roman stones.
First of all, I want to say. If the other debater treats the scholar we mentioned earlier as a dead book, he will read a dead book; Then, another debater said later that "the country broke the people's death", was he taking the old road ahead-meaning a kind of blind work? Let's start with what Si Tong said: Rousseau was to the French Revolution and Adam Smith was to the capitalist market economy. We don't say whether it is a transcendental theory or a theory formed from the practice of revolution and market economy. I want to ask my opponent: which theory is important? Is it important to practice? Without practice, would there be that great revolution? Without practice, would there be a current economy? These real revolutions and market economies are actually embodied in practice. Going back to the question mentioned above, what is the purpose of reading? The ultimate solution is to "apply what you have learned", which means that "use" is the most important thing. Practice, friend of the opposing debater!
If the opponent wins this debate, it just proves that the role of "reading thousands of books" is far greater than the role of our star's "practice" ("Take the Wan Li Road").
As for what the other debater said, this is not an appropriate metaphor, saying that practice is typing on the keyboard. I don't want to ask another debater: if you don't type in this debate, even if you are full of classics,
For your sentence-"Can you read Li Ka-shing now? Can't! Are there fewer people who read more than Li Ka-shing? Quite a lot! But why is there no achievement like Li Ka-shing? "
In fact, if you add another word, you will find that it is useless to take Li Ka-shing as an example. He doesn't help anyone. Change it to this—
"Now the business (practice) can make Li Ka-shing? Can't! Are there few people doing business like Li Ka-shing? Less! But why is there no achievement like Li Ka-shing? "
From the general situation of society, you have to admit that "reading thousands of books" has a more obvious and effective role in improving a person's quality in all aspects.
So, the other party thinks that reading thousands of books is not as good as typing. Do you think this is appropriate?
Let's start with this one:
"Now the business (practice) can make Li Ka-shing? Can't! Are there few people doing business like Li Ka-shing? Quite a lot! But why is there no achievement like Li Ka-shing? "
From the general situation of society, you have to admit that "reading thousands of books" has a more obvious and effective role in improving a person's quality in all aspects.
So, the other party thinks that reading thousands of books is not as good as typing. Do you think this is appropriate?
Let's start with this one:
"Now the business (practice) can make Li Ka-shing? Can't! Are there few people doing business like Li Ka-shing? Quite a lot! But why is there no achievement like Li Ka-shing? "
Isn't Li Ka-shing just practicing? Why don't many businessmen have the same achievements as Li Ka-shing? If their practices are not in place, this will not happen. Of course, just saying that Li Ka-shing can't explain anything, the other debater may answer the above question, saying that many businessmen can't achieve Li Ka-shing because they don't read much? Yes, the problem is so diverse! But when it comes to the ultimate goal of reading, that is "use", and the focus is on use. Doesn't that mean that Hang Wan Li Road is not more important than reading thousands of books?
I wonder if the following words have the nature of debate. I'm already confused. Say the discussion is no problem!
I also understood from the beginning that the focus of this debate is actually "inferior"; So, in which problem areas do the two have comparative significance? I'm asking myself the same question, okay? Since the topic is that it is better to read thousands of books than to take Wan Li Road-it is better to take Wan Li Road than to take Wanjuan Road, I think the argument should be about "taking Wan Li Road" and "reading thousands of books", not one of the fulcrums. If the argument is about acquiring knowledge, Wan Li Road is not as good as reading thousands of books VS acquiring knowledge and reading thousands of books-books are not as good as Wan Li Road. Undoubtedly, the theme of the debate said by the other party is correct. How can we argue and compare under such a big argument? I think it's looking for commonness comparison. I pay more attention to the evidence of both sides than one thing in common-you argue with me! I wonder if the other debater thinks so? Look at the debate topic of "the country is rich and the people are strong" VS "the people are rich and the country is strong" on the previous red bean debate platform. Are they looking for a common debate? Is to argue with the evidence and argue with it! Let's go back to a more limited problem category proved by the arguer. If we define this category as "reading thousands of books" and "taking the Wan Li road" is the way for people to achieve pioneering work (to improve and develop mankind), then how do the discussants view this issue?
As for what another debater said: only by clarifying the above-mentioned problems that need to be analyzed can we be targeted. It's true that I understand the analysis, but I always feel that the essence of the problem is more biased towards my own position. Just look at the above paragraph-during the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, a hundred schools of thought interacted and influenced each other. Has Confucianism, which has occupied the dominant ideology in China, gained a dominant position in the common ground of the opposite sex? Otherwise!
The same is true of the contrast between "reading thousands of books" and "taking Wan Li Road". Roman Si Tong, the opponent's debater
Say: If it is more effective to argue about "studying in thousands of books" or "taking the Wan Li Road", then we are absolutely confused and have no way to argue. Is that really the case? Will we, the opposing party, be absolutely lost in the debate about which is more important: "reading thousands of books" or "taking the Wan Li road"? Is there any way to defend it? I hope the other debater will give me advice in this regard?
I don't want to talk about the surrounding topics! In the whole debate, "learning" is immune to some extent (acquiring knowledge), while "using" is also a feeling of achieving the world (creating benefits). What kind of "not as good"? Needless to say-self-evident.
Although I have long been confused by the other party's long speech, since I signed up for the competition, I have to finish what I started. All right, bite the bullet and make your eyes suffer a little more.
At this point in the debate, as a supporter, you didn't even give the minimum argument. So, although you fought from the era of cold weapons to modern wars, from fist kungfu dancing to darts hidden weapons, from machine guns to machine guns, in the end, you even used nuclear weapons. However, none of this has hurt us. Hmm. How interesting
Anyway, you and I have reached a consensus in our previous speeches: Wan Li Road and thousands of books are both effective ways to master knowledge, and both are indispensable. Now, the difference between us is who is "inferior" to whom.
China has a saying: Is it a horse or a mule that pulls it out for a walk? You know, the 100-meter race is about drawing a runway, making rules, finding a good referee, and then running open-legged. So, where is the square runway in this debate? Where were the rules made? Unfortunately, I haven't seen it so far.
We have mentioned many times in previous debates that this debate is about which of these two methods is more firm, deeper and more effective in the process of mastering knowledge. Instead of using these two methods to master the amount of knowledge.
Since we want to compare, it is of course on the premise that both methods exist. For example, swimming, we can read a lot of theoretical books first, and then rush into the water to try our hand. You can also listen to the coach talk about the essentials and then feel it yourself in the water. Give the same sample for two days to see who learns quickly. In this case, the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods are clear at a glance.
We believe that, on the premise that both methods are feasible, taking Wan Li Road is more effective than reading thousands of books.
First of all, taking Wan Li Road is a personal practice and experience, so it can give the brain a direct access. What people get in this process is a direct feeling of knowledge. Because of this, this knowledge is often more solid and can be used by me anytime and anywhere. The knowledge gained from books is superficial and lacks rational understanding. It is precisely for this reason that we often say that reading is not difficult, and everything should be experienced in practice. Therefore, the quality of knowledge gained in the trip to Wan Li is far better than that gained by studying in thousands of books. Secondly, the knowledge gained by Wan Li Road comes from personal experience, and the knowledge in books comes from the experience of predecessors. As the saying goes, seeing is believing, hearing is empty, so the knowledge gained by Wan Li Road is more real and reliable;
Third, it is easier to find problems and invent new knowledge on the basis of Wan Li Road. As we all know, many important discoveries were discovered by accident in experiments.
Another debater mentioned medicine before. I want to ask each other, why do you want to study for five years as an undergraduate in clinical medicine? Isn't it to increase clinical practice time and master knowledge through personal experience? If you haven't done enough internship, who dares to let him cut his stomach? At present, powerful universities are applying to join the 2 1 1 project. To achieve this condition, in addition to throwing more boxes of books into the library, I am afraid the most important thing is to purchase experimental equipment and build experimental buildings and practice bases. Why do top scientists in China want the United States? In addition to the better economic benefits provided by the United States, I am afraid it is more important that the experimental facilities of American scientific research institutions are better! All these prove from the side that practice is more important than theory-yes!
At this point, the debater will definitely ask: Since Wan Li Road is better than Wanjuan Road, why do most people choose to study thousands of books at home instead of going out to Wan Li Road? We believe that we can't do it unless we don't want to! As we all know, due to the limitation of time, economy and energy, it is impossible for people to really walk the Wan Li Road. If there are no time and economic constraints, I think everyone is willing to experience what they have learned. With the development of TV and Internet, why do more and more people choose to travel? Knowing that traveling is a very tiring thing, why do so many people go to tourist attractions to suffer on May 11th? Isn't this a good example? Take your time! There are advantages and disadvantages!
Why can't I always do what others ask me to do? Be confident! It's no big deal, if you can't do it well, you can't do it well! If you do too much, you will naturally practice. Come on!
I always do what others don't want to do, or go too far, but I always don't know how to say it, just like I like music and painting. Knowing that beauty may not create beauty, but my personal ability has not reached that height.
There are many people who don't know me, so they are always doing things that hurt me, and I always forgive them. You are very kind, giving someone a rose is fragrant, and I believe that if you hurt others, you will hurt yourself. Since you hurt yourself, think about it from another angle. Maybe she hurt you and you hurt her. How can you treat you who hurt her? Your heart and your heart are easier. It is great to know how to forgive.
What if I can't always do what I want to do? Will is to be honed slowly,
Ask everyone about eating. If you only have 100 yuan and a bowl of noodles, 7.8 yuan, what can you eat for Chinese food?
If you want me, first buy 10 package of Laotan sauerkraut instant noodles and pack them, one package in 2.2 yuan, that is, 22 yuan money, one package a day, 58 yuan.
You can buy some bread in the supermarket, the kind of bread for 4 yuan. I'm sure you can't finish a meal. You can drink it with milk. This can last for a few days.
Then you can go for a few meals.
Besides, you can give others a few lessons, but this is what you have to pay back.
What are the things you can do, forcing others to do things that others can't ... your own material world ... some special family affairs.
What do animals do when they sleep, eat and walk? They are all frogs.
Why do you feel that what others do is meaningless? Because at your standard of living, you haven't met a successful person. In other words, you think you are surrounded by a group of mediocre people. But there is a saying that birds of a feather flock together. I forgot what the next sentence was. Push yourself forward.
What happens when people are forced to do things they don't like? People will bother you.