As a satiated work, the first movie won't get a low score for the first movie adapted from many novels and comics, because what everyone needs most is to see the characters, objects, plots and even the whole world view on paper moved to the screen, which is refreshing. For example, Transformers 1, Spider-Man 1 (original version) and so on. In fact, the adaptation is not excellent, but everyone calls it classic: Transformers 1. Although the plot is weak, it is too powerful because of many tributes, eggs, Optimus Prime, bumblebee and other image animations (it is said that Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone are the same.

The second is almost more loyal than the first. In my opinion, the second one has the most free pens.

The first and second books can be said to have faithfully restored the original works, and they can also be said to be quite satisfactory. The third film was directed by the famous Alfonso Cuarón, who made many bold adaptations that I found unacceptable at that time.

This is the first film that is not completely loyal to the original, so it can be said that it is full of controversy (at that time, now I believe that most people think this film is the best), and a lot of details of the original film have been deleted (for example, opening the gift box at Christmas, many small things in Crook Mountain, etc.). ).

There is an extremely important change in the setting of the third film: the protagonists no longer wear school uniforms and robes. This setting continues until the end. I still can't figure out why I'm so disloyal to the original. Is it to highlight the protagonist in the camera? Is it for commercial breaks? Or did the whole crew forget?

So the first part, the second part is relatively complete, and the third part is a failure.