Regardless of the reason, personal attack on others is wrong in itself. Even if others have bad moral character, they should not be condemned through personal attacks.
There is no legal definition of "personal attack", and theoretically there seems to be no limit.
However, judging from many factual bases, personal attacks should be oriented by public opinion and have no legal effect. However, most of them contain obvious personal subjective wishes, are highly targeted, and have clear purposes.
This text and speech are obviously emotional and the content is derogatory and offensive; so we should be able to define it: personal attack means that someone or some people use indiscriminate words to target other people and their bodies due to their subjective will.
, Speech attacks.
What is a personal attack? In fact, from a legal perspective, this issue should be called an infringement of personal rights.
Everyone has personal rights, including identity rights and personality rights.
Personality rights include life and health rights, reputation rights, name rights, and portrait rights.
Identity rights include personal rights, guardianship rights, and family rights in intellectual property rights such as honor rights, copyrights, invention rights, patent rights, trademark rights, etc.
The so-called personal attack means insulting others, deliberately fabricating facts, slandering others, and invading other people's privacy.
This behavior has caused other people to be harmed mentally and in life and caused serious consequences. This kind of behavior is legally called infringement of reputation rights. The parties can file a civil lawsuit and require the infringer to stop the infringement, restore reputation, eliminate the impact, and compensate for damages.
, apologize.
"Personal attack" is a form of discursive power. During the era of China's New Culture Movement, some so-called "fake foreign devils" began to use the term "personal attack."
For example, Lu Xun was not only the first person to use the term "personal attack", but he was also the one who was accused of "personal attack" the most.
Later, the term was widely used by officials and civilians.
"Attack" in legal terms refers to physical sexual contact and physical manifestations. The original meaning of "attack" in Chinese and "attack" in English are clear and unmistakable, and are in no way equivalent to insult, slander, slander, slander, or abuse.
Most people are addicted to using "personal attack", and most people are used to confusing "personal abuse" with "personal attack".
It obviously reflects the level of rationality, legal awareness, and moral standards of a society, because any debate, criticism, or disagreement does not constitute the essence of a personal attack. At best, it is the spiritual scope of insult, slander, and abuse.
There are many aspects that constitute personal attacks, such as violent personal attacks (intentional harm, beating others, etc.); verbal personal attacks (slander, insults, etc.); mental personal attacks (online insults, written insults, etc.); curses and personal attacks (explicit curses, covert insults, etc.).
Curse, etc.).