Recently, online media exposed a peasant woman selling traditional cooked meat. As a result, the buyer reported that the related products he sold were three-no products and appealed to the court. The court awarded the woman 50 thousand yuan in compensation, which also caused great public opinion response on the Internet.
Ms. Wang from Sichuan sells cooked meat online, which is a traditional farm dish made by her mother-in-law. A buyer spent 4500 yuan on 150 bowls. For any concerned seller, there are really many buyers who can meet such generous buyers. This seemingly normal buying and selling phenomenon finally surprised Ms. Wang. The buyer claimed that the cooked meat it sold belonged to "three no products", and sued the court to ask Ms. Wang to refund the purchase price and give it to 6544.
For any seller, it is obviously a very difficult problem to meet such a big-mouthed buyer. Ms. Wang also expected that she obviously met a liar and questioned that the other party was a professional counterfeiter. She thought that the other party's conditions for claiming compensation were for impure purposes, and said that she would continue to claim according to law.
Even if the buyer is a professional counterfeiter, after all, standing in the active position of legal basis, it does occupy a certain favorable position in safeguarding rights. After all, with the improvement of people's awareness of protecting their own consumers' rights and interests, it is in the case exposed above that Ms. Wang's local product practice has begun to take shape and does not belong to the traditional small production workshop. Therefore, as a commercial producer, she should truly abide by the relevant operating standards of the market, otherwise she will be at a disadvantage in the relevant transaction disputes.