First of all, don't be fooled. It's not that talent means no virtue at all. Looking around the world, you can't find a person without virtue. As a comparative debate, we can set the conditions that both of them are virtuous and one is more talented. But in this way, the other party can also say that both of them are talented and one is more virtuous. That's wrangling. So, let's see, two people, one is more talented and the other is more virtuous, which is more beneficial to society and mankind!

Now, to elect a leader, your vote is crucial. Here are some facts about the three candidates:

Candidate A: He has contacts with some dishonest politicians and knows astrology. He was having an affair. He is a heavy smoker and drinks 8 to 10 martinis every day.

Candidate B: He was fired twice in the past. He slept until noon, smoked opium in college and drank a quart of whisky every night.

Candidate C: He is a decorated war hero, a vegetarian, does not smoke, and only drinks a little beer occasionally. Never had an affair.

Who will you choose among these candidates?

Candidate A is franklin roosevelt, candidate B is Winston Churchill and candidate C is Adolf Hitler.

Who do you think is talented and beneficial to society?

In fact, which is more important, talent or virtue, that is to say, which is beneficial to the development of society and mankind.

Let's stop here and go on.