With the increasing awareness of citizens' rights, we can not only take up legal weapons to safeguard our own rights and interests, but also impose more severe penalties on infringers. However, some associations can't use legal means correctly. Officials say that Tongguan Chinese hamburger has no right to collect franchise fees. Can merchants rest assured? They can indeed operate safely for three reasons:
First, their use of trademarks is legal.
The reason why I say this is because they can indeed be recognized by the government, and they can run their own shops with more peace of mind. Because the official response can not only show that the behavior of merchants is legal, but also prove that merchants can properly use geographical indications. Therefore, they will not be punished by law and will not be prosecuted again.
Second, they can be protected by law.
I really think they can feel more at ease in the course of business operation, because they can be protected by law and will not suffer losses because of illegal prosecution by others. They not only don't have to pay the so-called joining fee, but also don't have to be more worried because of the prosecution of the association, which can provide them with security.
Third, they don't have to worry about their future.
In my opinion, they can really behave more correctly according to official arguments, and they don't have to worry about their future. Because they don't have to worry that their legitimate actions will be attacked by others, and they don't have to worry that the trademarks they use will be taken back by others. They can use this trademark within a specific scope and obtain long-term use rights.
That's my analysis.