Chiang Kai-shek's soldiers are all Springfield-style armed forces, and bullets are cut off from time to time. The Red First Division of the US Army and the 10 1 cavalry division were also equipped with an M 1, and the bullets could not be exhausted. This is only the gap in equipment level, and factors such as soldiers' quality, training, commanders, logistics and comprehensive national strength have not been taken into account. Can these two be the same?
Of course, I know what you want to ask is the gap between the National Revolutionary Army in 1944 and Chinese people's Volunteer Army in 5 1 year.
As far as the substantial damage to the enemy is concerned, the volunteers can't compare with the National Revolutionary Army.
Because the volunteers only killed and injured American troops on the battlefield, most of the prisoners were kept in prison camps. Apart from some activities in prison and consuming American rations, their only contribution was being abused by the Kuomintang authorities and becoming blood evidence of Chiang Kai-shek's tyranny. The national army is different. In the eight years of the Anti-Japanese War, the national army defected1500,000 people. After these people entered the puppet government, they extorted money from the local area, which seriously damaged the economic production and normal social life in the occupied areas, making it impossible for the Japanese aggressors to obtain enough manpower and material resources from the occupied areas to support their aggression. As a result, after 40 years, the front line was basically fixed, and the Japanese invaders could no longer casually pierce most of China as they did in 37 years. From this point of view, the combat effectiveness of the national army that interrupts the economic lifeline of the Japanese army is much higher.