Current location - Recipe Complete Network - Food world - How to prove that Darwin is a liar who deceives the world and steals fame?
How to prove that Darwin is a liar who deceives the world and steals fame?

Communication: Culture | Sinology | Art | Philosophy | Health | Vision | Essay

Author: Tian Shizhi, the landlord of Xiliang (commonly known as sweet persimmon), born in 199, is a poet, wandering in Urumqi. A commoner in the land of Saibei roams the world, asking Wen Da not to be a vassal, but to be at large in the world. The night is long and frequent, and the frost and scissors are cold. Write novels, write poems, learn painting, and manage printing.

I really don't understand. All false things are more popular than real things.

Yu Dan's understanding of the Analects of Confucius was far from meeting the publishing requirements when he submitted the manuscript (submitted the speech).

Zhonghua Book Company (the best ancient books publishing house in China) specially organized an editorial team to make extensive revisions from chapter style design, wording and sentence making to the verification of each citation.

Of course, the result is that everyone is happy. The book has sold millions of copies, and the copyright has been sold in more than 2 countries and regions, and more market profits have been earned.

After Chinese people can eat meat and wear warm clothes, they naturally have a spiritual need. Apart from Degang Guo and soap operas, they also want a cultural product: they can learn some pretentious knowledge easily, buy the feeling of literary youth at the lowest price and with the least brain cells.

therefore, Yu Dan came into being. Yudan's market positioning is accurate, and it can meet the needs of the overwhelming majority of the people in our country just right, so it has achieved great market success. At this time, Yudan has begun to package itself elegantly.

in fact, Yu Dan is not talking about the Analects of Confucius, but about political propaganda that meets the requirements of the times and caters to the argument of moral governance in a certain era. The Analects of Confucius is just a carrier. Of course, she can also talk about the Book of Songs and the Book of History. Perhaps the Analects of Confucius is more widely known, or its content is more colloquial, and it is easier to find a melody to cater to its main purpose.

Therefore, it must not be regarded as an academic phenomenon. At most, it is a political and academic speculator, or perhaps a typical representative of academic mentality in colleges and universities. It can even be said that she is a successful beneficiary of academic decline: high popularity (because of political needs), high income (business needs) and high political treatment (trumpeters also need to be appeased).

So, Qian Qian's tens of thousands of Yu Dan students are crouching in the luxurious office of colleges and universities, not engaging in academics, but thinking about how to practice Yu Dan's road to success.

A lot of previous comments talk about Yu Dan's contribution, which is not true. If many people are read the Analects of Confucius in a funny way, why not read it? In today's society, which lacks speculation, Quyi will only be magnified, because it is chicken soup-because it is not necessary to move your head, and it is the misfortune of the article, the failure of academics and the failure of the whole education.

I haven't heard of autumn cranes in recent days, and countless cicadas make noise in the setting sun. After reading several lectures on the Analects of Confucius, we can see that she really doesn't know much about the Analects, and she suspects that she hasn't even read the Analects completely. The understanding of many places can no longer be described as strange, but as indescribable strange. It is totally incompatible with other people's research. From this point of view, she is still quite powerful, which proves that she has never read other people's research materials on the Analects of Confucius.

On the other hand, she is a talkative person, who is full of useless talk about nutrition. How to put it, this kind of person is quite easy to mix in this society, because many people care about what they can say, but no one cares about what they say. Yu Dan is so good at pouring chicken soup that she can get along well in places like pyramid schemes without attending lectures. No kidding, it's true. Because she has a good talent in this field. A lotus flower with a flowing tongue.

Zhu Weizheng, a late professor at Fudan University, criticized Yu Dan for not knowing the Analects of Confucius and lacking relevant common sense. Although Zhu Weizheng is far superior to Dan professionally, readers would rather trust Yu Dan. If Yu Dan doesn't understand The Analects of Confucius, it means that readers are inferior to others, and readers don't want to be so self-oriented, so they will complain that scholars are too serious and choose to believe that Yu Dan can read classics, and they have read The Analects of Confucius, Zhuangzi, the world and marriage because they have read Yu Dan.

Confucianism, or traditional culture in a broader sense, wants to be revived, not by Kan Kan, a master of Chinese studies, talking in front of the camera and promoting Amway, nor by scholars who are poor in their study and sit on the bench, but by living as much as possible. Every Confucian lover has two hundred children, and the revival of traditional culture is expected.

There is a word in Historical Records that well describes people like Guo Moruo who are contemporary Yu Dan, and that is "Youmeng". Historical Records says: "Youmeng makes people happy in Chu", so "Youmeng" is a performer in opera, and it can also be said to be a puppet. It's not clear whether this kind of training scheme for literati will corrupt the whole nation after all, but at least it won't develop in a good direction.

feel good, please like it below

feel good, please like it below.